Master patient confidentiality, legal compliance, and professional responses to protect your practice reputation.
Negative patient reviews demand careful, professional responses—but in Australia's regulated healthcare environment, responding poorly can trigger AHPRA complaints or legal action. The key is acknowledging patient concerns while maintaining strict confidentiality and professional standards. This requires understanding patient privacy laws, AHPRA regulations, and state-based health legislation before you respond.
Medical practices operate under Australia's strictest regulatory frameworks. The Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (HPRN), managed by AHPRA, sets specific obligations around patient privacy and professional conduct that don't apply to other industries.
According to a 2023 Australian Medical Association survey, 67% of medical professionals report that online reviews influence patient decisions—yet many lack formal training in responding to criticism. When you respond to a negative review, you're demonstrating professional standards, respecting patient autonomy, and protecting sensitive health information. Get it wrong, and you face complaints to AHPRA, legal action, or mandatory investigations.
No. This is the golden rule.
Even if the patient has publicly identified themselves, you must never confirm their identity, treatment details, or medical history in your response. This violates the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth), AHPRA Code of Conduct (conduct standard 2.3), and state-based health privacy legislation.
A Melbourne GP practice learned this in 2022 when they responded to a negative Google review by mentioning the patient's specific condition and treatment dates. The patient filed an AHPRA complaint, resulting in a formal investigation and mandatory privacy training.
You can:
• Acknowledge the patient's experience without confirming identity • Outline your general practice standards and protocols • Invite the patient to discuss concerns privately • Provide factual corrections about your practice • Reference your complaints procedure
You cannot:
• Mention specific diagnoses, treatments, or medical history • Confirm appointment dates or frequency of visits • Reference staff members or other patients • Disclose why a patient was discharged or refused treatment • Share details about referrals or specialist consultations
AHPRA has published clear guidance on professional conduct in the digital age:
Each state has additional requirements:
• NSW: The Health Records and Information Privacy Act 2002 adds extra obligations for private health providers • Victoria: The Health Complaints Act 2016 requires documented complaints management procedures • Queensland: The Health Quality and Complaints Commission investigates complaints about private health services • WA: The Health Complaints Act 1995 includes guidance on responding to public complaints
Check your state's health regulator website for specific requirements.
Wait 24-48 hours before responding. This gives you time to review the complaint objectively, check clinical records, consult colleagues, and draft a professional response without emotional reaction.
Separate fact from opinion:
• Factual claims ("The doctor didn't examine me") – Address with general practice standards • Opinion-based complaints ("The doctor was rude") – Acknowledge the patient's experience • Misinformation – Correct factually without identifying the patient
Never assume you know which patient left the review.
Use this framework:
Opening: "Thank you for taking the time to share your feedback. We're sorry to hear you had a negative experience at our practice."
Acknowledgment: "We understand your concerns about [general issue]. Patient satisfaction is important to us."
Context: "Our standard practice is [general statement about protocols]. We always aim to [general commitment]."
Action: "We'd welcome the opportunity to discuss this further. Please contact our practice manager on [phone number]."
Example:
"Thank you for your feedback. We're sorry to hear about your experience with wait times. We understand how frustrating delays can be. Our practice aims to see patients within 15 minutes of their appointment time. We'd love to discuss this further—please call our practice manager on 02 XXXX XXXX."
Notice: No mention of the patient's condition, appointment date, or identifying information.
Before posting, ask yourself:
• Have I identified or confirmed the patient's identity? • Have I mentioned any medical condition, treatment, or diagnosis? • Have I referenced specific dates, times, or staff members? • Does my response maintain professional standards? • Have I invited private resolution? • Is my tone respectful, not defensive?
If you answered "yes" to any of the first three questions, rewrite your response.
Post your response on the platform where the review appeared (Google, Healthgrades, Zocdoc, Facebook, etc.).
If the patient contacts you, document everything:
• Date and time of contact • Method (phone, email, in-person) • Summary of discussion • Any actions taken • Outcome
Keep these records for at least 5 years.
A Brisbane cardiologist responded: "This patient was advised of the risks before proceeding with the angiogram, as documented in our consent form from 15 March 2024." This confirmed the patient's identity and treatment details—a serious breach.
Better approach: "Our practice follows strict informed consent protocols. Patients always receive detailed information about risks and benefits before any procedure."
Responses like "This patient was non-compliant" are unprofessional and may constitute defamation. Never attack or demean the reviewer.
Don't justify clinical choices in your response. This can imply admission of liability and breach confidentiality.
Silence suggests you don't care about patient feedback. Responding professionally demonstrates accountability.
Avoid "We'll refund your fee" in public responses. Handle compensation privately.
1. Assign Responsibility
Designate one or two staff members (usually practice manager + senior clinician) to review and approve all responses.
2. Create Response Templates
Develop practice-specific templates for common scenarios: wait time complaints, communication concerns, billing disputes, clinical outcome concerns, and appointment scheduling issues.
3. Set Response Timeframes
Aim to respond within 5-7 business days.
4. Monitor All Platforms
Reviews appear on Google, Healthgrades, Zocdoc, Facebook, and specialty platforms. Don't miss reviews on any platform.
5. Track and Analyze
Maintain a spreadsheet of review dates, platforms, ratings, complaint categories, responses sent, and outcomes. This helps identify patterns requiring systemic changes.
1. Don't Delete Anything
Keep the original review, your response, and all related documentation.
2. Gather Supporting Evidence
Collect your complaints policy, staff training records, the response process you followed, and any correspondence with the patient.
3. Seek Legal Advice
Contact a lawyer experienced in healthcare law before responding to the regulator.
4. Be Honest About Mistakes
If you made an error, acknowledge it, explain what you've learned, and outline corrective measures.
• Never confirm patient identity in any review response • Avoid mentioning medical details, diagnoses, treatments, or appointment specifics • Maintain professional tone and avoid defensive language • Invite private resolution rather than debating publicly • Document your process to demonstrate AHPRA compliance • Respond within 5-7 days to show you take feedback seriously • Train your team on confidentiality obligations • Use reputation management tools to monitor reviews across platforms
Responding to negative medical reviews in Australia requires balancing reputation management with strict legal and ethical obligations. By implementing a documented process, training your team, and monitoring reviews consistently, you can address patient concerns professionally while protecting your practice from regulatory risk.
No. Even if the patient publicly identified themselves, you must never confirm their identity, treatment details, or medical history in your response. Doing so violates the Privacy Act 1988, AHPRA Code of Conduct, and state-based health privacy legislation. This is the golden rule of responding to negative medical reviews.
Poor responses can result in complaints to AHPRA, legal action, and damage to your practice's reputation and credibility. Medical practices operate under strict regulatory frameworks including the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (HPRN). Inappropriate responses may breach patient confidentiality laws and professional conduct standards.
Respond professionally without identifying the patient or disclosing medical details. Acknowledge concerns, offer to discuss privately, and demonstrate your commitment to patient care. Keep responses brief, factual, and focused on your practice's standards. Consult your professional indemnity insurer or legal advisor if unsure about specific situations.
Medical practices operate under strict AHPRA regulations and patient confidentiality laws that retail or hospitality businesses don't face. You must protect sensitive health information while responding to criticism. According to a 2023 Australian Medical Association survey, 67% of medical professionals report reviews influence patient decisions, yet many lack formal training.
Respond professionally without confirming patient details or treatment specifics. You can politely correct factual inaccuracies about your practice's policies or services without breaching confidentiality. If the review is defamatory, consult your legal advisor. Consider reporting to the review platform if it violates their guidelines.
Yes. You must comply with the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) and Australian Privacy Principles (APPs), AHPRA Code of Conduct (conduct standard 2.3), and state-based health privacy legislation. These laws protect patient information and set professional standards for how you communicate about patient matters publicly.
Not necessarily. Respond to reviews that allow you to address legitimate concerns or clarify misunderstandings about your practice without breaching confidentiality. Ignoring all negative reviews can damage credibility, but responding to every review—especially with defensive language—may escalate issues. Quality over quantity is key.
Patient Review Platforms: Which Matter Most for Australian Doctors? For Australian doctors, 73% of patients check online reviews before selecting a new...
Financial Advisor Reviews: Compliance & Best Practices Financial advisors in Australia must comply with ASIC's advertising standards when requesting and...
When to Ask Electrical Customers for Reviews: Data-Backed Timing The best time to ask electrical customers for reviews is within 24-48 hours after job...
Join hundreds of Australian businesses automating their review management with AI
Get Started Now